The Ethics of ‘Deathbots’

Article Properties
Abstract
Cite
Lindemann, Nora Freya. “The Ethics of ‘Deathbots’”. Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 28, no. 6, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00417-x.
Lindemann, N. F. (2022). The Ethics of ‘Deathbots’. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00417-x
Lindemann, Nora Freya. “The Ethics of ‘Deathbots’”. Science and Engineering Ethics 28, no. 6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00417-x.
Lindemann NF. The Ethics of ‘Deathbots’. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2022;28(6).
Journal Categories
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Ethics
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Philosophy (General)
Science
Science (General)
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Sociology (General)
Technology
Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
Technology
Technology (General)
Industrial engineering
Management engineering
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Engineering Affect

Philosophical Topics 42 2019
Presence in absence. The ambiguous phenomenology of grief Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
64 2018
An ethical framework for the digital afterlife industry Nature Human Behaviour
  • Science: Science (General)
  • Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
  • Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry: Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system: Psychiatry
26 2018
The Political Economy of Death in the Age of Information: A Critical Approach to the Digital Afterlife Industry Minds and Machines
  • Science: Mathematics: Instruments and machines: Electronic computers. Computer science
  • Science: Mathematics: Instruments and machines: Electronic computers. Computer science
36 2017
Technology of the Dead: Objects of Loving Remembrance or Replaceable Resources? Philosophical Papers
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
6 2015
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Embracing grief in the age of deathbots: a temporary tool, not a permanent solution Ethics and Information Technology
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics
  • Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Bibliography. Library science. Information resources: Information resources (General)
  • Social Sciences
2024
The Affective Scaffolding of Grief in the Digital Age: The Case of Deathbots Topoi
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
2024
Real Feeling and Fictional Time in Human-AI Interactions

Topoi
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
2024
(Self-)Envy, Digital Technology, and Me

Topoi
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
2024
Exploring the Immortological Imagination: Advocating for a Sociology of Immortality

Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences: Sociology (General)
2024
Citations Analysis
The category Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General) 4 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Real Feeling and Fictional Time in Human-AI Interactions and was published in 2024. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Real Feeling and Fictional Time in Human-AI Interactions. This article reached its peak citation in 2024, with 5 citations. It has been cited in 3 different journals, 33% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Topoi cited this research the most, with 3 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year