Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines
Article Properties
-
LanguageEnglish
-
DOI (url)
-
Publication Date2022/05/19
-
Journal
-
Indian UGC (journal)
-
Refrences77
-
Citations4
-
Jakob Stenseke ORCID (unauthenticated)
Abstract
Cite
Stenseke, Jakob. “Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines”. Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 28, no. 3, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00378-1.
Stenseke, J. (2022). Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00378-1
Stenseke, Jakob. “Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines”. Science and Engineering Ethics 28, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00378-1.
Stenseke J. Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2022;28(3).
Journal Categories
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Ethics
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Philosophy (General)
Science
Science (General)
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Sociology (General)
Technology
Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
Technology
Technology (General)
Industrial engineering
Management engineering
You May Also Like
- Preregistering qualitative research
- The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity
- Empirically supported ethical research practice: The costs and benefits of research from the participants’ view
- Caring, Control, and Clinicians' Influence: Ethical Dilemmas in Development Disabilities
- Betrayal Trauma: Traumatic Amnesia as an Adaptive Response to Childhood Abuse
Refrences
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1142/S270507852150003X | 2021 | |||
Implementations in Machine Ethics | ACM Computing Surveys |
| 37 | 2020 |
| Virtuous vs. utilitarian artificial moral agents | AI & SOCIETY |
| 19 | 2020 |
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines | Minds and Machines |
| 472 | 2020 |
Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment | Minds and Machines |
| 118 | 2020 |
Refrences Analysis
The category
Science: Mathematics: Instruments and machines: Electronic computers. Computer science 18
is the most frequently represented among the references in this article. It primarily includes studies from Minds and Machines and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. The chart below illustrates the number of referenced publications per year.
Refrences used by this article by year
Citations
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
On the computational complexity of ethics: moral tractability for minds and machines | Artificial Intelligence Review |
| 1 | 2024 |
| Subjectness of Intelligence: Quantum-Theoretic Analysis and Ethical Perspective | Foundations of Science |
| 2024 | |
| A Comparative Defense of Self-initiated Prospective Moral Answerability for Autonomous Robot harm | Science and Engineering Ethics |
| 2023 | |
Ethical issues of the use of AI-driven mobile apps for education | Frontiers in Public Health |
| 11 | 2023 |
Citations Analysis
The category
Social Sciences 3
is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled A Comparative Defense of Self-initiated Prospective Moral Answerability for Autonomous Robot harm and was published in 2023. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Subjectness of Intelligence: Quantum-Theoretic Analysis and Ethical Perspective. This article reached its peak citation in 2024, with 2 citations. It has been cited in 4 different journals, 25% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Foundations of Science cited this research the most, with 1 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.