Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Title Publication Date Language Citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009/10/01English8,480
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases1992/06/01English7,917
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration2009/10/01English7,501
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies2008/04/01English7,371
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires2007/01/01English6,622
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables2011/04/01English6,056
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence2011/04/01English4,933
Validation of a combined comorbidity index1994/11/01English4,704
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–20082010/11/01English3,111
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes2010/07/01English2,680
Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial2011/02/01English2,307
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement2016/07/01English2,263
Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews2005/10/01English2,208
The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): Development and evaluation1993/02/01English2,161
The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2005/09/01English2,007
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2011/04/01English1,864
GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology2011/04/01English1,838
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2011/12/01English1,687
New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality2004/12/01English1,657
Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement2012/09/01English1,591
Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation1989/01/01English1,588
Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2014/12/01English1,569
Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies2014/04/01English1,558
Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing values2006/10/01English1,522
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes2008/02/01English1,508
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency2011/12/01English1,497
Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates1995/12/01English1,397
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects2014/03/01English1,387
Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectives1993/10/01English1,332
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2010/08/01English1,319