The techniques of risk analysis are insufficient in themselves

Article Properties
Abstract
Cite
Frosdick, Steve. “The Techniques of Risk Analysis Are Insufficient in Themselves”. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, 1997, pp. 165-77, https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569710172937.
Frosdick, S. (1997). The techniques of risk analysis are insufficient in themselves. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 6(3), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569710172937
Frosdick S. The techniques of risk analysis are insufficient in themselves. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. 1997;6(3):165-77.
Journal Categories
Geography
Anthropology
Recreation
Environmental sciences
Medicine
Internal medicine
Special situations and conditions
Industrial medicine
Industrial hygiene
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Commerce
Business
Personnel management
Employment management
Description

Is technical skill enough to truly manage risk? This article explores the idea that while **risk analysis** techniques are necessary, they are not sufficient on their own for effective **risk management**. It argues for a more comprehensive approach that considers decision-making processes and contextual factors. The article proposes that **risk analysis** encompasses risk identification, estimation, and evaluation, and uses these components as a framework for discussion. Within each framework, the article provides an overview of common and important techniques. It then delves into the issue of sufficiency, discussing the limitations of relying solely on technical tools. The paper refers to decision-making techniques in **risk management** and supports its thesis with the techniques. By highlighting the importance of decision-making and contextual understanding, the article offers valuable insights for professionals involved in **risk management**, encouraging them to adopt a more holistic approach. The work may further research for practical application of techniques.

Published in Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, this paper directly addresses a core concern of the journal: how to effectively manage risk in the context of potential disasters. By arguing that technical risk analysis is insufficient, the paper encourages a broader perspective on disaster preparedness, aligning with the journal's focus.

Refrences
Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled Risk evaluation and its importance to project implementation and was published in 2002. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Risk evaluation and its importance to project implementation . This article reached its peak citation in 2015 , with 6 citations.It has been cited in 41 different journals, 2% of which are open access. Among related journals, the International Journal of Project Management cited this research the most, with 3 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year