The Professional Animal Scientist

Title Publication Date Language Citations
I nvited P aper : Nutritional and management considerations for beef cattle experiencing stress-induced inflammation 1 1This article was based on a presentation at the ARPAS Symposium “Understanding Inflammation and Inflammatory Biomarkers to Improve Animal Performance” at the 2016 Joint Annual Meeting, July 19–23, 2016, Salt Lake City, Utah.2017/02/01English58
Control of liver abscesses in feedlot cattle: A review11Contribution no. 10-205-J from the Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan 665062015/04/01English48
Review: Comparison of 3 alternatives for large-scale processing of animal carcasses and meat by-products2016/06/01English36
Effect of ensiling time and hybrid type on fermentation profile, nitrogen fractions, and ruminal in vitro starch and neutral detergent fiber digestibility in whole-plant corn silage2015/04/01English29
Mathematical linkage of total-tract digestion of starch and neutral detergent fiber to their fecal concentrations and the effect of site of starch digestion on extent of digestion and energetic efficiency of cattle2016/10/01English27
REVIEW: Traditional and alternative sources of fiber—Roughage values, effectiveness, and levels in starting and finishing diets11Substantial portions of this paper were presented at the 2012 Plains Nutrition Council Spring Conference and published in the conference proceedings (AREC 2012-26, Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Amarillo).2014/12/01English26
I nvited R eview : Ruminal microbes, microbial products, and systemic inflammation 1,2 1Presented as a part of the ARPAS Symposium: Understanding Inflammation and Inflammatory Biomarkers to Improve Animal Performance at the ADSA–ASAS Joint Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, July 2016. Funding was provided by the ARPAS Foundation. 2Contribution no. 17-366-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.2017/12/01English24
Management characteristics of beef cattle production in the Northern Plains and Midwest regions of the United States2016/12/01English23
R eview : Effect of forage provision on feed intake in dairy calves2016/08/01English23
R eview : The link between feeding dairy cows and Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese production area2017/10/01English22
Forage fermentation product measures are related to dry matter loss through meta-analysis2015/04/01English21
Meta-analysis examining the effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on feedlot performance and carcass traits1,2,31Use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by Colorado State University or the authors or criticisms of similar products not mentioned.2Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the products by Colorado State University or the authors and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.3Partial sponsorship of this study was provided by Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA 52404.2016/04/01English20
Review: Advantages and limitations of dairy efficiency measures and the effects of nutrition and feeding management interventions2017/08/01English19
I nvited R eview : The roles of forage management, forage quality, and forage allowance in grazing research 1 1This review article is based on a presentation by the author in the symposium “Design, Analysis, and Execution of Quality Grazing Research” at the meeting of the American Society of Animal Science Southern Section, February 1, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia, in conjunction with the SERA-41 Beef Cattle Forage Utilization Group and the South Central Chapter of the American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Appreciation is expressed to the symposium sponsors: The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Elanco Animal Health—Stocker District, Vigortone, and Barenbrug USA.2016/02/01English19
Invited Review: Advantages of current and future reproductive technologies for beef cattle production2016/04/01English19
Controlling herbage allowance and selection of cow genotype improve cow-calf productivity in Campos grasslands2018/02/01English18
R eview : Transportation of commercial finished cattle and animal welfare considerations2017/10/01English18
T echnical N ote : Daily variation in intake of a salt-limited supplement by grazing steers2017/06/01English18
Effect of bovine respiratory disease during the receiving period on steer finishing performance, efficiency, carcass characteristics, and lung scores2017/02/01English17
CASE STUDY: Reducing dietary protein decreased the ammonia emitting potential of manure from commercial dairy farms2015/02/01English17
I nvited R eview : Grazing management options in meeting objectives of grazing experiments 1 22016/02/01English17
Ameta-analysis of effects of nutrition and management during the stocker and backgrounding phase on subsequent finishing performance and carcass characteristics2014/12/01English17
T echnical N ote : Application of models to estimate daily heat production of lactating sows2017/06/01English16
Symposium Paper: Transportation issues affecting cattle well-being and considerations for the future2016/12/01English16
Review: Nitrogen sustainability and beef cattle feedyards: II. Ammonia emissions11Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA.22The USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, and so on) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.33Funded by the Beef Checkoff.2015/10/01English16
Management characteristics of cow-calf, stocker, and finishing operations in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas11Funded in part by The Beef Checkoff and the USDA Agricultural Research Service. The authors thank the producers and members of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association for their help in providing information supporting this analysis.2015/02/01English15
Effect of injectable trace mineral administration on health, performance, and vaccine response of newly received feedlot cattle2016/12/01English15
T echnical N ote : Evaluation of an ear-attached movement sensor to record rumination, eating, and activity behaviors in 1-month-old calves2017/12/01English15
Management characteristics of beef cattle production in the western United States2017/08/01English15
Management characteristics of beef cattle production in the eastern United States2018/08/01English14